Following my friend Alhad Joshi’s comment at LinkedIn
“Something interesting came up. Someone suggested that end-users actually do not need any data management system at all. They know where their data is.” I made up my mind and thought this would be an interesting comment to discuss.
One of my customers in this CAE data management space described the biggest value for the him was the seamless changeover if somebody in his team was replaced. The new person could immediately start where the predecessor has stopped without searching for data and files.
By automation of standards in CAE and implementing in a management system companies can have huge positive impact on the value of simulation.
However, the user might be reluctant if he has to change the way of working, thinks to lose control of his data and therefor losing power. Although this is a natural reaction, the value for the team is so huge, that most of the arguments coming from the user community might become relative.
When it comes to the question of implementing a CAE data management system, customers usually run a TCO or ROI calculation. Of course they take into account IT management effort, licensing cost, maintenance, hardware etc. and run it against time saving, reduced headcount cost etc. but rarely rate the value of collaboration improvement. There are a lot of positive and money saving effects for the customer but the exploration needs thorough and detailed discussions upfront – who spends the time for this?